Become a Member

Get access to more than 30 brands, premium video, exclusive content, events, mapping, and more.

Already have an account? Sign In

Become a Member

Get access to more than 30 brands, premium video, exclusive content, events, mapping, and more.

Already have an account? Sign In



UCI rejects Froome’s defense, sends case to anti-doping court

Chris Froome's Salbutamol case heads to an anti-doping tribunal after the UCI does not accept his explanation of Vuelta finding.

Heading out the door? Read this article on the new Outside+ app available now on iOS devices for members! Download the app.

PARIS (AFP) — The UCI has rejected Chris Froome‘s explanations as unfounded and referred his case to an anti-doping court, French daily Le Monde reported on Friday.

Team Sky and Froome had hoped the UCI would find there were no grounds to penalize the four-time Tour de France winner. Instead, the UCI has opened the door to disciplinary proceedings by sending the adverse doping test Froome returned at the Vuelta a España last season to a tribunal.

In previous cases, Diego Ulissi tested positive for a similar level of the same drug, Salbutamol, at the Giro in 2014 and was banned for nine months by a Swiss disciplinary panel. In the 2007 Giro, Alessandro Petacchi tested positive for Salbutamol and was then banned for a year by the Italian authorities.

Froome had around twice the allowed amount of asthma drug Salbutamol in his urine when tested on September 7 on his way to victory in the Vuelta. He argued there were natural reasons for this.

The 32-year-old Froome insists there was no wrongdoing on his or the team’s part. He is allowed to continue competing until the case is decided upon because it is not a prohibited substance according to World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) rules.

“It is well-known that I have asthma and I know exactly what the rules are. I use an inhaler to manage my symptoms and I know for sure that I will be tested every day I wear the race leader’s jersey,” Froome said when the news of the finding broke.

“My asthma got worse at the Vuelta so I followed the team doctor’s advice to increase my Salbutamol dosage. As always, I took the greatest care to ensure that I did not use more than the permissible dose.”

The UCI looked into Team Sky’s arguments and has dismissed them after the dossier was scrutinized by its independent LADS (legal anti-doping services), which was established in 2015, Le Monde reported.

The case will go to court and although no date has been set, it would appear there will be no ruling in time to stop Froome competing at the Giro d’Italia, which starts in Jerusalem May 4.

[related title=”More on Chris Froome” align=”right” tag=”Chris-Froome”]

German judge Ulrich Haas will oversee the case according to French sports daily L’Equipe.

Froome was quick to fire off a tweet late on Friday, although he wasn’t specific about what news he felt was false: “Fake news making the rounds again this evening. What journalists and publications won’t do for a couple of clicks…”

WADA director general Olivier Rabin said of the adverse Salbutamol finding that “the rule has been established for a long time, the allowed level has not changed and similar cases have already been judged by CAS.”

Froome, a Kenyan-born Briton, has this season already finished 10th in the Ruta del Sol and 34th in the Tirreno-Adriatico, will use the Tour des Alpes (formerly known as the Giro del Trentino) as his last warm-up for the Giro.

An American in France

What’s it like to be an American cyclist living in France? Watch to get professional road cyclist Joe Dombrowski’s view.